In India, marital agreements are very rare and have no laws in force. However, in the face of rising divorce rates, there is a growing interest in them. Some legal experts believe that prenups have no legal sanctity in India. However, in some cases, usually among wealthy citizens, a form of contract is signed. But agreements must be reasonable and not violate existing laws, such as the Hindu Marriage Act. Indian courts allow for the signing of a settlement protocol during divorces. But no court has yet been asked to impose a prenup.  In family law, this generally concerns a party who receives a portion of the property in question before the property is definitively divided by court order or by the consent of the parties, usually to pay the lawyer`s fees for that person. Premarital mediation is another way to create a conjugal arrangement. In this process, a mediator facilitates an open discussion between the couple on all kinds of marriage issues, such as expectations regarding post-birth work and savings and spending styles, as well as traditional pre-marital discussions on real estate sharing and spousal assistance when the marriage is over. The engaged couple makes all decisions about what would happen in the event of separation or divorce with the help of the mediator. They then design either a memorandum of agreement or a pre-marital agreement and have them checked by their respective lawyers.
A developed agreement on mediation is usually cheaper because fewer hours are spent with lawyers, because the couple made all the decisions together, instead of one side against the other. [Citation required] Post-nuptial agreements are similar to marital agreements, except that they are made after a couple`s marriage.  When divorce is imminent, post-uptial agreements are called separation agreements.  In most cases, people generally want to protect the property they bring to marriage and bypass the system of ownership and debt-sharing established by provincial family law; A lot of people are looking for a “I`ll hold what`s mine, you`re going to hold, what`s your” type of agreement, and that – or any other kind of reasonable deal – is exactly what you can get with a marriage contract. In such circumstances, it really doesn`t make much sense to have a marriage contract. There are no children to worry about, and neither side has assets to protect entry into marriage. What would be the purpose of a marriage contract? Marital conventions are civil, so Catholic canon law does not exclude them in principle (for example. B to determine how property is distributed among children in a previous marriage after the death of a spouse).
Recently, a movement has developed in some modern Orthodox circles to support an additional marital agreement. This is a reaction to a growing number of cases where the husband refuses to grant a religious divorce. In such cases, local authorities are not in a position to intervene, both for the sake of separation of church and state and because some halachic problems would arise.