Shared Service Agreements Television

An LMA or similar agreement has no influence on the ownership of the station`s license, meaning they do not need fcc authorization to set it up, and the two stations are still legally considered separate operations from a licensing law perspective. [11] Both Tribune Media and Gannett Company were required to use the common service agreements as a similar loophole to take control of certain channels during their respective purchases of Local TV and Belo in 2013, as they had no exception to the FCC`s restrictions on inter-newspaper ownership in the relevant markets. [12] [13] Since then, both companies have relocated their publishing arms as independent companies; tribune Publishing Company and Gannett Company. For reasons of profitability, the operation of stations can be optimized by sharing resources such as facilities, advertising sales, staff and programming. [10] Many broadcasters involved in the practice believe that such agreements are beneficial for the survival of television channels, especially in smaller markets, where the overall reach is much smaller than that of markets concentrated in densely populated agglomerations and the savings achieved through the consolidation of resources and staff, may be necessary to finance the continued operation of a chain. [10] [11] In comments filed with the Federal Communications Commission, the CWA invited FCC regulators to order broadcasters to disclose all radio and television agreements (SSA). The CWA also reaffirmed its support for the Commission`s long-standing rules as the best way to achieve its policy objectives and called on the FCC to maintain the current rules on local television ownership, local radio ownership, prohibition of cross-border ownership of newspapers and broadcasts, and provisions relating to alternating networks. . .

.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.